I find it unbelievable that a court would consider disenfranchisement in California.
Since I turned 18, I have voted in every election which I have been able. From school levies to presidential elections, I’m there. Are the candidates ever interesting, no. Are the issues every compelling, not really.
Of all the states I’ve voted in, California has by far been the best. Since I’ve been here, I’ve voted at my local polling place, by absentee ballot, and by touch screen voting — almost two weeks before election day. That’s right we can vote early here (just not often).
California has been by far the best at informing voters. For each election we get a voter information guide, it gives you the candidates, their positions, and the text of the propositions on the ballot. Additionally, I’ve always received a sample ballot — that is an exact reproduction of the actual ballot.
Did I mention these all come in four to six different languages. Voting in California couldn’t be any easier. This is why I find it incredible that the American Civil Liberties Union would file a lawsuit now arguing disenfranchisement.
If punch card voting is so bad then where was the ACLU for all those years that poor and minority voters’ rights have been trampled upon. Where is the ACLU when it comes to county registrars and state legislatures making it difficult or illegal for convicted felons to vote. Unless there are satisfactory answers to those questions — then partisan politics can be the only obvious answer.